Comments on: Tar Magazine – a review

By: Magtastic Blogsplosion | So far, half empty

Magtastic Blogsplosion | So far, half empty — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 20:38:55 +0000

[...] for its industrial noun title, new magazine glass might be thought of as a British version of Tar – and the similarities don’t end there. Some of the contents of its issue zero are more [...]

By: Simone

Simone — Tue, 14 Apr 2009 23:58:37 +0000

Spot on!
this is basically furnishings material for an élite set and is meant more as a fetish communicating refinement and artiness rather than actual reading stuff.

TAR is neither ‘edgy’ nor particularly well-researched (nor would it need to be), its main asset is the tactile and visual splendour.

By: al.w

al.w — Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:55:50 +0000

TAR MAGAZINE HAS A GREAT COVER (TACTILE)
WITH SOME INTERESTING CONTENTS, MAY BE IT SHOULD BE MORE LIKE ARTFORUM LESS TEXT MORE CLEVER IMAGERY, LOKKING FORWARD TO THE NEXT ISSUE? JUST TO SEE HOW YOU SHOW IMPROOVE.

By: Mr. McGinnis

Mr. McGinnis — Tue, 09 Dec 2008 20:20:29 +0000

I like the cover, and that is it. I hate magazines that talk about giving unique perspectives and voice blah blah blah. It’s the same old NY media crap, same people you see everywhere saying the same things.

By: Martin Adolfsson

Martin Adolfsson — Tue, 02 Dec 2008 03:24:41 +0000

Interesting review! Looking forward to take a look at the magazine myself.

/Martin!

By: Nuno Vargas

Nuno Vargas — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:37:27 +0000

Sir, spot on.
Cheers,
n

By: Quinta Tinta

Quinta Tinta — Sun, 30 Nov 2008 21:47:51 +0000

[...] [Justo mientras escribía este post me he encontrado con que Andrew Losowski ha publicado una completa y no del todo complaciente crítica de revisa, contenido y diseño. “Tar is one of the most thoughtful, well-designed new magazines I’ve seen in a while. And yet something doesn’t feel right.” Muy interesante. Está aquí.] [...]